The Humble Libertarian

Mind your business.

Friday, November 17, 2017

Taxation Is Theft and Democracy Is One of The Biggest Scams Ever Perpetuated on Mankind

A libertarian has a debate with a democratic socialist about taxes and civilization after he posted the meme above.

"Taxes and govt didn’t make all that stuff. Engineers, scientists, and business people did. I don’t have to be in a civilization with you personally, Josh. I should be able to freely associate or not with whomever I choose. This idea of society as a whole that I have to accept or reject altogether, all 300 million of you, and if I accept you get to cut me in half to throw half of me into the common pool with half of everybody else for us all to pick people based on a popularity contest to be in charge of how to distribute it back to us is the most preposterous inanity ever devised by the sick minds of man!"
If you agree, please share this post!

Thursday, November 16, 2017

In The 1970s Hillary Clinton Helped Get A More Lenient Sentence for a 41yo Man She Knew Raped a 12yo Girl

Have we all been asleep???

This was publicly available information during the 2016 presidential campaign.

The recorded interview in which Hillary tells all about this incredibly sordid thing she did, was uncovered and published in 2014.

But it was never widely addressed by the media and voters two years later.

Most people are probably still unaware of this strange and unseemly fact today.

Here's what happened:

"In 1975, the same year she married Bill, Hillary Clinton agreed to serve as the court-appointed attorney for Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old accused of raping the child after luring her into a car.

The recordings, which date from 1983-1987 and have never before been reported, include Clinton's suggestion that she knew Taylor was guilty at the time. She says she used a legal technicality to plead her client, who faced 30 years to life in prison, down to a lesser charge."

On the tape Hillary Clinton actually laughs with veteran Arkansas journalist Roy Reed about knowing the man was guilty!

When the tape emerged in 2014, very few media companies picked it up. One Daily Beast journalist was amazed by the tape:

"It’s hardly unusual for a criminal trial lawyer to gossip about a courtroom triumph on behalf of a less than admirable client, often with gallows humor and over drinks after a hard day’s work.

But it’s highly unusual for a lawyer to boast and laugh about such a circumstance in an on-the-record interview with a journalist—and pretty much jaw-dropping when the lawyer is Hillary Rodham Clinton."

The recording is especially striking today, because this rapist's M.O. --luring young girls into his automobile, plying them with alcohol-- is eerily similar to Judge Roy Moore's.

The part that Hillary laughs about in the tape, was knowing that the 41-year-old man was guilty of raping a 12-year-old girl.

"He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs [laughter]."

And it's something much worse than "a courtroom triumph on behalf of a less than admirable client."

Because she also says in the recorded interview, that she voluntarily took on this man's case as a favor to another lawyer.

So no one can argue she was just doing her job. She made the choice to represent a man who she was sure raped a 12-year-old girl.

And she used legal technicalities to reduce his sentence from as much as 30 years...

To just 10 months behind bars, then free again to menace more young girls.

This was your champion of women and feminism in America.

This is the completely and utterly fake sham that is U.S. politics.

And it takes on new meaning as Roy Moore faces intense media and public scrutiny for accusations that he molested and sexually assaulted high school girls in the 1970s.

If Roy Moore had been prosecuted for these accusations in Arkansas in the 1970s, Hillary Clinton might have defended him.

And would have unscrupulously used any legal technicality she could to get him a reduced sentence.

And put him back on the streets where he could endanger more young girls.

This should give Democrats serious pause to consider what they've done by supporting Hillary so uncritically.

Those who exalt themselves will be humbled. 2017 is making that prediction quite accurate.

And those who humble themselves will be exalted. Please for the love of good and truth, please humble yourselves.

66 million of you thought you knew what you were talking about when you vocally supported Hillary, some in frenzied tones of moral ascendancy.

Couldn't have even imagined the possibility that you were wrong.

Anyone who's sick to their stomachs now please share this post. It's time to wake up.

We can do better.

And please LIKE my Facebook page:

And please FOLLOW me on Twitter:

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

The Response to Roy Moore Proves Politics Makes People Literally Insane

Only a fake Christian or someone who is too uninformed to have any business voting could now cast a ballot for Roy Moore.

Child Molester (R)

A sane, moral person sees "child molester" and wants to strangle the guy.

The political partisan says that hasn't really been proven and the Washington Post just wants to hand the Democrats a Senate seat.

But the only reason they believe Moore after that Hannity interview is because all they can see is that "(R)" next to his name.

Which is a branded signal to activate the mental short circuit that years of partisan propaganda has implanted in their brains.

The "(D)" has the same effect on a similar number of people in this country. And it's a lie that there's a difference between them.

The lie is part of the short circuit.

The short circuit is activated by a carefully cultivated mental implant that causes temporary insanity and bouts of amnesia.

No, I'm not wearing a tinfoil hat. I don't mean a physical, electronic implant.

The brain is a computer.

And the implant was programmed in with words and images.

Politics thrives on a mental disorder, on repressed knowledge.

It splits off and represses the part of someone that knows something that the disordered part of them doesn't want to be true.

A Freudian slip is when the repressed knowledge slips through the censor.

The political partisan says that hasn't really been proven and the Washington Post just wants to hand the Democrats a Senate seat.

No, you just want to hand the Republicans a Senate seat. And you clearly don't give a shit who sits in it or how they've hurt others.

Everybody deserves a chance to answer serious accusations made against them before we make up our minds about them.

Well Roy Moore has had his chance to answer the accusations that he drove a 14-year-old girl to be alone with him in his house and molest her twice when he was a 32-year-old Assistant D.A. in Alabama.

That he started circling another 14-year-old girl at the local mall, until her mother told him to back off when she was 16.

That many locals in the area, including another assistant D.A. at the same time as Moore, have said off and on the record that it was common knowledge that Moore "dated" high schoolers and was banned from the local mall for hanging out there alone and sniffing around high school girls.

(That's not dating. That's just fucked up.)

That he drove a 16-year-old girl to a dark parking lot by a dumpster behind a restaurant and violently sexually assaulted her.

That he told her afterwards:

"You’re just a child and I’m the district attorney of Etowah County, and if you tell anyone about this, no one will believe you."

"Why now?"

Yeah I wonder.

The Washington Post article says why now. Read the whole thing, and if you have any more questions you can ask then.

If you're too lazy to do that (which means it is impossible for you to have a valid opinion about this one way or the other and you should not voice one), then there's this:

"It’s a fair question.

But Moore, long a radioactive figure at the state level, has never felt the heat of the national press corps quite like this before.

He just won a Senate primary race that attracted national attention as a front in a GOP civil war, and he has gained new prominence at a time when women are, en masse, telling their experiences with sexual harassers."

Roy Moore has had a chance to answer the accusations against him and he's lied, contradicted himself, and used some of the most guilty-sounding hedges and weasel words possible for a man in his position.

About the violent sexual assault accusation, Roy Moore said:

"I can tell you without hesitation this is absolutely false. I never did what she said I did. I don’t even know the woman. I don’t know anything about her. I don’t know where the restaurant is or was."

But his accuser produced her high school yearbook at a press conference with his signature on it and a note to her that said:

"To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say ‘Merry Christmas.’ Christmas 1977. Love, Roy Moore D.A. 12-22-77 Olde Hickory House"

The signature matches his.

So he lied.

Anybody who listens to both sides can't possibly find his side credible.

All he has left is the letter next to his name.

That goes for his answers to the accusations made by the other four women too.

During an interview with the friendliest possible media treatment he could get, from Sean Hannity (R) of Faux News (R).

In which he contradicts himself, dodges questions, and offers some of the most amazingly milquetoast denials for someone whose political career and reputation hang on these accusations not being true.

"But neither of them have ever stated any inappropriate behavior."

Buddy, they're saying you were making out with highschoolers when you were 32.

"Hannity: But do you remember ever going on a date with her?

Moore: I don't remember specific dates. I do not. And I don't remember if it was in that time or later. But I do not remember that. No."

Oh you don't remember "specific" dates? Because you went on so many of them right? Can't keep all the "dates" you went on with highschoolers in your 30s straight?

"Hannity: But you know her, but you never dated her. Ever? Is that what you're saying?

Moore: I know her, but I don't remember going out on dates. I knew her as a friend. If we did go out on dates, then we did, but I do not remember that."

You were friends with a high schooler?

What did you two pals talk about? The Osmonds? Normative jurisprudence?

"If we did go out on dates, then we did." Sounds like you did, Roy.

"Hannity: At that time in your life, let me ask you this: You do remember those girls. Would it be unusual for you as a 32-year-old guy to have dated a woman as young as 17, that'd be a- what- 15 year difference, or a girl 18. Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?

Moore: Not generally- no. If I did, you know, I'm not going to dispute anything, but I don't remember anything like that."

"Not generally- no."

Just listen to the part where he says that in the interview. It starts at 4:00 in the embedded clip above. It's already bad enough on a transcript. But listening to it is cringe inducing.

That's a campaign ad for a 10 second spot.

"Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?"

"Not generally- no."

With such a credible case against him, if not for a criminal conviction (the man is not on trial here, his liberty is not in danger), then for us not to trust him or put him in any position of power whatsoever.

With Moore caught in a lie about one of the accusers, stammering, tripping all over himself, contradicting himself, giving answers that are obviously not forthright.

What the fuck are voters in Alabama doing telling the media that they're still going to elect Roy "not generally a child molester" Moore?

He's leading Doug Jones by 6 points! I bet he wouldn't be if 14-year-old girls could vote.

Currently 49 percent of the voters say they're voting for Moore. Why isn't that number in the single fucking digits!?

I'll tell you what they're doing. They're losing their fucking minds over a lapel pin with a red, white, and blue elephant on it.

That lapel pin doesn't mean anything, you idiots! Donald Trump switched from (D) to (R) and you didn't even notice.

They're going to walk into the voting booth and forget what they know, like they've done with partisan politics all their lives.

Like Democrats did when they voted for Hillary who stayed married to a man who multiple women have accused of sexual assault and harassment.

Who laughed on tape with a journalist, about getting a more lenient sentence for a 41-year-old man who she knew raped a 12-year-old girl as a criminal defense lawyer in Arkansas in the 1970s.


Did you ever hear about that once in 2016?

Society, like individuals, makes itself aware of what it wants to be aware of, and forgets what it wants to forget. Especially when money and politics are involved.

It's time to start paying attention, and remembering, and getting better.

Money isn't everything.

And neither is a stupid fucking Senate seat.

Please share if you agree:

And please LIKE my Facebook page:

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Some Libertarian Thoughts About FLOTUS Melania Trump

Some libertarian ideas for Melania Trump if she wants to pick a pet issue to support as FLOTUS.

My latest video. Enjoy:

Monday, November 13, 2017

Video Surfaces of Moore Kissing 15 Year Old at A Party in 1982! Watch:

In the clip an obviously drunk Moore aggressively kisses the 15 year old at a party in 1982 while other party guests whoop in approval.

First kiss starts at 01:22.

Second kiss at 01:49.

Third kiss at 04:36...

Yeah, it's not that Moore. It's Demi Moore.

But she's an adult and he's a minor.

And she's really giving it to him too!

In the first kiss she could be slipping him some tongue.

The 15 year old is Philip Tanzini (Moore's General Hospital co-star)... it was Philip's birthday.

What do you think about this? Is it okay?

Should her career be over like Kevin Spacey's?

Should FOX write her out of her recurring role on the hit hip-hop drama Empire?

If this were a male celebrity of Demi Moore's status, no doubt this would be trending on Twitter and the headlines would say:

"Not Funny: Video of Steve Carrell Sexually Assaulting a Minor at a Party in 1982."

And everyone would hate the man.

Because there are some major double standards against men in this country.

And some of them are really shitty in my opinion.

Is this one a fair double standard?

If you think the question merits a serious discussion as society sorts out its sexual mores and standards in the hopes of doing better, please share this post.

I'll tell you what I think.

I think it's not fair.

I think it stems from a deep rooted cultural bias that idealizes women and demonizes men.

So we view men in the worst possible light and women in the best possible light.

And it manifests in all kinds of terrible, sexist ways that are unfair to men. Ask a man who's been through the court system over a divorce. Especially if he has kids.

It also comes from a sexist cultural bias that infantilizes women as weak, helpless, and delicate, something that works against positive female empowerment.

If you agree, please share this post:

And please LIKE my Facebook page: