Thursday, March 12, 2009

I miss Bill Clinton


Editor's Note: I take it back. I miss him a lot less than I thought I did.

--------------------

I can't believe I'm writing this, but I miss Bill Clinton.

After eight years of Bush and less than two months of Bush 2.0, I'm so sick of the maddening irresponsibility obscured by partisan bickering. And you know what? Clinton was way better than either Bush or Obama. I recognize that in a lot of ways I miss Clinton because I miss Gingrich, but Clinton should get to share credit with the Republican Congress for the policies he helped craft and which he signed into law. I'm also not saying he was the perfect president or that I agree with all his policies and proposals. I could easily draw up a list of complaints, but on the whole, I'd say Bill Clinton was one of the best presidents we've had in the last century of American history- certainly better than 43 and 44.

Reason contributor Steve Chapman put it best when he wrote last week that:

Clinton, for all his appetites and excesses, was a cautious, centrist sort of Democrat. He had innumerable ideas for things the government could do, but most were small and fairly innocuous. He was willing to go along with Republicans on some of their sound ideas—such as balancing the budget, reforming the welfare system, and expanding foreign trade.

He focused on making government better, not making it bigger. He didn't greatly enlarge Washington's role in our lives. He proclaimed—or conceded—that the "era of big government is over."

Here are 6 reasons to miss Bill Clinton:


1. Balanced Budget

Unlike the last two administrations which seem to have a pathological obsession with running monstrous budget deficits, Bill Clinton made it a priority to balance the US Federal budget and was the first U.S. president to report a surplus since the 1960s. The problem with deficits is that they are financed by issuing debt (which hogs credit markets and pushes up interest rates, hurting economic growth) and printing money (which inflates the value of our currency, eating away at every American's earnings and causing prices to rise). Deficit spending also allows government to grow beyond all sense of reasonable proportion. Take a look at this graphic and tell me which recent president has been the most responsible with the Federal budget:

(Source- PowerlineBlog | Hat Tip: David Boaz, The Cato Institute | Edits mine)


2. Welfare Reform

In contrast to the big entitlement mentality and policies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama, Bill Clinton promised welfare reform to slim down and improve the results of Federal entitlement programs. He differed with Congressional Republicans over how to best reform welfare, and vetoed two of their welfare reform bills, but eventually signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act in 1996.


3. Expanded Foreign Trade

Bill Clinton worked to expand international trade and eventually signed and pushed for the ratification of NAFTA. While NAFTA remains controversial, Clinton's effort to create a free trade zone in North America has significantly increased the flow of goods and services across borders, resulting in greater wealth and productivity for the citizens of the three signatories to this agreement. Contrast this with Bush's steel tariff fiasco and Obama's "buy American" provision in the stimulus bill. These protectionist policies hurt international relations, risk setting off a "trade war," and block increased productivity by obstructing the free flow of goods, services, and capital across borders and resulting in their subsequent global misallocation.


4. Bipartisanship

In each of the three examples above, Clinton worked together with Republicans to make it happen. A Republican Congress helped pass those budgets that eventually yielded surpluses, and the Gingrich Congress shared Clinton's goal of balancing the Federal budget. This wasn't a Democrat or Republican issue. It was a "be smart" or "be dumb and irresponsible" issue, and the leaders of both parties chose to be smart. There were hard fights over welfare reform, which is okay, and in fact it's a wonderful part of our democratic, federal system of government. But both sides agreed that welfare needed to be reformed, and they eventually came together and made it happen. As for NAFTA, that was an item on the agenda of Clinton's Republican predecessor, and Clinton took up the torch and carried it through to ratification during his presidency. Clinton was able to govern from the center, to govern cautiously and practically, and to concede to the merit of Republican ideas and policies. This is a sharp contrast to the bitter partisanship of the Obama and Bush administrations.


5. Prudence

A lot of why we should miss Bill Clinton isn't about what he did in office, but what he didn't do. Bill Clinton just didn't do half the crap that we have let the last two administrations get away with. He didn't advocate the breakneck expansion of government into every aspect of our lives like Obama and Bush have. He didn't grab for unchecked executive power. He didn't push the Patriot Act, the Iraq war, No Child Left Behind, the Medicaid drug benefit, the Stimulus bill, the Afghanistan troop surge, or monstrously unbalanced budgets. Back then, we talked about the Federal budget in billions, not trillions like today. Back then, things just seemed more simple, manageable, reasonable, and prudent. Today the government has gotten way out of control, and there is no evidence from Obama that he plans to curb it. I wish Obama would be Clinton 2.0 and not a Bush/Carter hybrid, and I wish Bush had been Reagan 2.0 and not a Nixon/Johnson hybrid.


6. Bill Clinton Had Soul




Spread the Word!


Delicious button

Stumbleupon


9 comments:

Chris F. said...

In a weird way, I am kind of with you on this. I reminisce about the 1990's as the good ole days. Sadly, the immediate future will be much worse than it is now.

TennZen said...

And to add to your list of fond remembrances, Bill Clinton really did seem to have his fingers on the pulse of the common man. Remember "I feel your pain?" When Bill Clinton spoke, it genuinely seemed like he was talking TO us and not AT us.

I have often wondered what the reaction to 9/11 would have been if it had happened under Clinton's watch rather than under George II's watch.

Unlike the "let's win one for the Gipper" Reagan era, and the detached feeling we got from both Bushes, Clinton really seemed to empathize.

And Obama? He's the rockstar... or the Messiah. There's no "he's one of us" vibe from Obama. He says one thing ("no earmarks") and then turns right around and blatantly does another.

All Clinton did was fool around. Gawd, I can't believe I just said that!

W. E. Messamore said...

Ha ha ha ha... it's so funny to me that you guys know exactly what I mean. You feel kind of strange about it, but you realize that yeah, Clinton really wasn't so bad, and in many ways was actually pretty good for our country.

Then when we realize how small and petty our differences with Clinton seem by comparison to our differences with Obama and Bush, we get snapped back to 2009 and just end up feeling bad. Thanks for letting me know that I'm not the only one.

Elijah said...

I'm sorry but he failed in the most critical aspect of his role as president. He was a piss poor CINC.

W. E. Messamore said...

I wish I could have mentioned military policy in this list, but it is notably absent. Like the two presidents to follow him, Clinton was too hawkish, with the most major troop deployments of any president in history.

And like 43 and 44, when he did deploy troops, he didn't use overwhelming force and give them reasonable rules of engagement so they could be safe and do their job.

He could see that the Cold War was ending, and was smart enough to cut down the size of the DOD, but then stretched it thin and wasn't smart enough to prepare for the unconventional methods of international terrorism.

But still... I think he was a better Commander in Chief than Bush and probably Obama- we'll see.

Anonymous said...

Clinton didn't balance the budget and there was no "surplus".

http://mises.org/story/542

W. E. Messamore said...

Wow. That's really eye-opening. Seriously- thanks very much for sharing that. I will be sure to publish a retraction soon when I get a chance.

ffbull said...

I only have to think about black hawk down and changing the responsibility for rocket research funnelled to China from the Defense Dept. to the Commerce Dept. Although the later was not changed by the Neo-con Bush.

W. E. Messamore said...

Didn't hear about that last one. Though yes, Clinton's many, many major troop deployments (more than any other president in history) will definitely count against him in the history books.

Post a Comment

 
Related Posts with Thumbnails