Friday, October 30, 2009

Alcohol and cigarettes are more harmful than Ecstasy and LSD?

"Ecstasy, LSD and cannabis are less dangerous than alcohol and cigarettes, the Government’s chief drug adviser claims today.

Professor David Nutt is calling for a new 'index of harm' to warn the public about the relative dangers of various substances.

He says alcohol should rank fifth, behind only cocaine, heroin, barbiturates and methadone, while tobacco should rank ninth, ahead of cannabis, LSD and Ecstasy.

His comments are likely to prove explosive, given the seniority of his position. Professor Nutt has also courted controversy in the past - by suggesting taking ecstasy was no more dangerous than riding a horse."

Read the rest here.

2 comments:

conservative generation said...

I don't suppose drug tests are mandatory for Obama officials?

W. E. Messamore said...

Who needs drug tests? I'd be all for litmus tests for insane, Marxist sympathies.

Post a Comment