Why wouldn't they be happy that a woman made a choice? Why wouldn't they appreciate that Tim Tebow was the result of that choice? They are pro-choice, right? Perhaps the ones that had a fit over the Tim Tebow ad are really just pro-abortion?
Grant Davies over at What We Think and Why had another epiphany about the pro-choice lobby in America while watching the Planned Parenthood response to the Tebow ad:
For his part, Joyner explains; "My daughter will always be my little girl." He goes on to say; "But I am proud everyday as I watch her grow up to be her own person, a smart, confident young woman. I trust her to take care of herself. We celebrate families by supporting our mothers, by supporting our daughters. By trusting women."
Except, of course, in all other matters concerning their health and lifestyle choices. For those decisions his daughter, mother and all other "strong and wise women" need government employees and political hacks making the tough calls. There is no way that these people could be so inconsistent in their views, right?
What a fantastic point! We need to make a political television / radio ad out of that right away! How can any person who claims to be pro-choice ever support socialized or fascist medicine? It is a fact that the Pelosi-Reid legislation in Congress does not leave it up to the woman to make her own choices about her own body. It puts those choices about her body in the hands of the government. Some consistency please?